A History of Wide-Open French Open Women’s Draws

For the last few years, we’ve been hearing a lot about “depth” in women’s tennis. No player has emerged as a dominant force since Serena Williams began her maternity leave after the 2017 Australian Open. On yesterday’s podcast, I argued that this year’s French Open felt particularly wide-open, especially after seeing a Rome final contested between Karolina Pliskova and Johanna Konta, two women who aren’t known for their clay-court prowess.

When the tape stopped rolling, I generated a forecast for the tournament, using surface-specific Elo ratings for a field made up of the top 128 women in the official rankings. (The makeup of the actual draw will differ, but the exact qualifiers and wild cards typically don’t affect the results very much.) Reigning champ Simona Halep comes out on top, with a 22.2% chance of defending her title. Petra Kvitova is next, just above 10%, followed by Kiki Bertens, who narrowed missed double digits.

The forecast gives two more entrants a 5% chance at the title, five more a 3% or better probability, and another nine a 1% chance. That’s a total of 19 women (see below) with at least a 1-in-100 shot, including such underdogs as Anett Kontaveit and Petra Martic. Maria Sakkari, winner in Rabat and semi-finalist in Rome, is 20th favorite, just below the 1% threshold. There isn’t much to separate the players in the bottom half of this list, and when the draw dishes out shares of good and bad fortune, the order will surely shift.

This all seems … pretty wide-open. It’s certainly a shift from the French Open of 30 years ago, when a dominant Steffi Graf entered with a 68% probability of securing the title, one of only five players with better than a 1% chance. (The tennis gods scoffed at our future retro-forecasts: Arantxa Sanchez Vicario carried her 1.5% pre-tournament odds to the championship.)

The 19-strong gang of one-percenters is, indeed, a very recent development. In the previous 30 years, the average number of players going into the tournament with 1%-or-better title odds was 11.5, and it only reached 19 three times, two of which were 2017 and 2018. (The other was 2010, with a whopping 23 one-percenters, and not a single player above a 13% chance of winning.) As recently as 2004, only eight women had reason to be so optimistic before the first balls were struck.

The second-tier group of favorites–entrants with a 1% shot at the title, but not much more–is the most distinctive feature of recent French Opens, and it lends credence to the argument that women’s tennis is particularly deep these days. You may not take the chances of 17th-seeded Kontaveit too seriously, but she is more a factor than similarly-seeded players 15 years ago.

When we narrow our focus to competitors meeting higher thresholds, like 3% or 5% title-winning probabilities, the present era looks less novel. From 1989 to 2018, the typical field included 6.5 women with 3%-or-better chances, and 4.8 women at 5% or higher. This year’s group includes ten in the first category and five–roughly the historical average–in the second. Only the army of one-percenters sets the 2019 bracket apart from, say, the 1997 field, when nine women headed to Paris with a 3% shot, seven of them at 5% or better.

What has changed is the dominance of the player at the top of the list. The average favorite of the last three decades opened with a one-in-three chance of winning, while Halep hasn’t exceeded 23% in her three years as frontrunner. Here are the ten “weakest” Roland Garros favorites from 1989 to 2019:

Year  Favorite            Fave Odds     
2010  Venus Williams          12.9%     
2018  Simona Halep            19.1%  *  
2011  Caroline Wozniacki      22.0%     
2019  Simona Halep            22.2%     
2017  Simona Halep            23.0%     
2006  Justine Henin           23.3%  *  
2005  Justine Henin           23.4%  *  
2012  Victoria Azarenka       24.1%     
2008  Maria Sharapova         24.5%     
2009  Dinara Safina           24.7%

* Favorites who went on to win

The French Open has traditionally made the women’s field look deep, even when it wasn’t particularly so. The favorite has only claimed the trophy in 8 of the last 30 tournaments, a 27% mark that would almost qualify for the above list. Sanchez Vicario twice won with sub-2% pre-tourney odds, Anastasia Myskina’s 2004 title was a 0.8% shot, and Jelena Ostapenko entered the 2017 event as 27th favorite, behind Mona Barthel and Katerina Siniakova, with a 0.4% probability of winning.

Surprises, then, have always been part of the program in Paris. Without an overwhelming force at the top of the draw with a “1” next to her name, the field has finally caught up. No individual has a particularly good chance of going on a victory tour, but a staggering array of contenders have reason to hope for a magical fortnight.

The complete list of “favorites” sorted by chance of winning: Halep, Kvitova, Bertens, Pliskova, Ashleigh Barty, Angelique Kerber, Elina Svitolina, Caroline Wozniacki, Garbine Muguruza, Naomi Osaka, Sloane Stephens, Marketa Vondrousova, Madison Keys, Konta, Serena, Kontaveit, Caroline Garcia, Victoria Azarenka, and Martic.

Podcast Episode 62: A Roman Holiday for Rafael Nadal and Karolina Pliskova

Episode 62 of the Tennis Abstract Podcast, with Carl Bialik of the Thirty Love podcast, recaps the ATP/WTA joint event in Rome, where Rafael Nadal got his mojo back, winning his ninth title with a decisive final-round victory over Novak Djokovic. We pick apart some of Djokovic’s decision-making, especially his 18 dropshots.

A less-polished clay-court performer, Karolina Pliskova, took the women’s title, and we explain why the conventional wisdom understates how well her game adapts to the dirt.

Also: Nick Kyrgios wants attention, and we give him some.

Thanks for listening!

(Note: this week’s episode is about 64 minutes long; in some browsers the audio player may display a different length. Sorry about that!)

Click to listen, subscribe on iTunes, or use our feed to get updates on your favorite podcast software.

Roger Federer, Lottery Winner

In today’s third-round match in Rome, Roger Federer posted a truly unusual stat line. He beat Borna Coric in three sets, 2-6 6-4 7-6(7), winning 95 points to Coric’s 107. That’s a total-points-won rate (TPW) 47.0%, not unheard of for a match winner, but near the lower limit of what’s possible. By Dominance Ratio (DR)–the ratio of return points won to serve points lost–Fed comes out at 0.78, where 1.0 represents an evenly-split match. He has won only 24 times in his career with a DR below 1.0, and today was the first time since 2015. These types of decisions are often referred to as “lottery matches,” because there is more luck than usual involved in the result.

Not only did Federer win the match with a TPW below 50% and a DR below 1.0, all three of his individual sets were below those numbers. He won 23 of 55 points in the first set, 31 of 64 in the second, and 41 of 83 in the third. The low total in the first set is to be expected–he lost that set badly. But often, low numbers for an entire match stem from a bad performance in a single set, like the swoon in a 7-6 1-6 7-6 contest. Coric outplayed him–narrowly, at least–in all three sets.

You might suspect that this is extremely rare, and you’d be right. Only 4.5% of ATP tour-level matches end in favor of the player who won fewer points, and 7.2% go the direction of a player with a DR below 1.0. Those numbers usually overlap, but not always. Roughly 4.0% of matches are won by a player with a TPW below 50% and a DR below 1.0. Individual sets are even more likely to be awarded to the player who won more points. Just 2.4% of sets are won by the man who lost more points. The frequency of DR < 1.0 is 7.4%, about the same as at the match level.

It turns out that there is a precedent–exactly one!–for Fed’s feat, of winning a match with TPW < 50% and DR < 1.0 in each of three sets. That’s one previous occurence in my dataset of point-by-point sequences for over 17,000 ATP tour-level matches since 2010. Inevitably, John Isner was involved. At Memphis in 2017, Isner lost his quarter-final match to Donald Young, 7-6 3-6 7-6. Young won only 46.9% of total points, and his DR was 0.66, both marks among the lowest you’ll ever see for a winner. Like Federer, Young came close in the sets he won, tallying 49.3% of all points in both the first and third set. By saving eight of nine break points and withstanding the Isner serve in the tiebreaks, Young managed to overcome a statistically superior opponent.

Federer’s victory today wasn’t particularly reliant on break point performance, though fans will be encouraged that he converted two of his four opportunities. Much has been written about Roger’s ineffectiveness in this sort of match–against his 24 wins with a sub-1.0 DR, he has 49 losses with a DR above 1.0–and break point futility is often to blame. While big servers tend to play a lot of close matches, Federer has managed to record plenty of wins without relying on the lucky ones.

With a guaranteed place in the prominent parts of the record book, Fed is making a move on the obscure pages in the back. Having repeatedly shown us that he can win matches by outplaying the guy on the other side of the net, he finally came up with a victory when the stats pointed in the other direction.

Podcast Episode 61: Reading Rafael Nadal’s Tea Leaves

Episode 61 of the Tennis Abstract Podcast, with Carl Bialik of the Thirty Love podcast, struggles to draw conclusions from Rafael Nadal’s latest surprise loss in Madrid. The King of Clay has no titles in 2019–not even a clay-court final–but his longer-term track record still suggests he’s the favorite (or close) at Roland Garros.

We also cover the continued late blooming of Kiki Bertens, the surprise relevance of Roger Federer, the return of the always-dangerous Serena Williams, and the abysmal doubles record of Marco Cecchinato.

Thanks for listening!

(Note: this week’s episode is about 62 minutes long; in some browsers the audio player may display a different length. Sorry about that!)

Click to listen, subscribe on iTunes, or use our feed to get updates on your favorite podcast software.

Podcast Episode 60: Goodbye, David Ferrer. Hello, Cristian Garin

Episode 60 of the Tennis Abstract Podcast, with Carl Bialik of the Thirty Love podcast, delves into the little-known group of dirt-ballers, including Garin, Matteo Berrettini, and Guido Pella, who are piling up the clay-court wins in 2019. We mull the vagaries of surface-specific Elo ratings, as well as the types of skills that might lead these guys to have crossover success on faster courts.

We also touch on the WTA results in Rabat and Prague, with a particular focus on the up-and-down career of Johanna Konta. Finally, we consider how David Ferrer stacks up against the best in the history of the sport, as he plays his last event in Madrid this week.

Thanks for listening!

(Note: this week’s episode is about 63 minutes long; in some browsers the audio player may display a different length. Sorry about that!)

Click to listen, subscribe on iTunes, or use our feed to get updates on your favorite podcast software.