Last week, John Isner beat world number one Novak Djokovic. Earlier this year, the victim was Roger Federer. At least year’s French Open, Rafael Nadal had to go to five sets to eliminate the big man. Between Isner’s massive serve and the general improvement in his game, it seems that he can beat anybody.
To beat big John, you need either a strong return game or solid tiebreaker skills. Ideally, you’d have both. (The only alternatives are to catch him on an off-day or to play him on a slow clay court.) Let’s take a look at how opponents have fared against the Isner serve over the course of his career.
One surprising indicator of return prowess is ace-rate-against. We tend to think of ace rate as a function only of the server’s ability, perhaps coupled with surface speed. But returner’s have plenty to say about it, too. Simply looking at Isner’s 17 tour-level matches this year, we see a remarkable range of ace rates, from 36.6% of points against Gilles Muller in Memphis down to 5.6% against Federer in Indian Wells. Surface plays a role, as do a variety of other factors (maybe Isner was tired after beating Djokovic in the semifinal last week), but some players are considerably better than others at getting the ball back in play.
A thorough look at that phenomenon is a subject for another day. There’s plenty to do simply comparing performances against Isner. As I’ve noted before, a big serve doesn’t necessarily make a player more unpredictable, though of course such a weapon might make him a better player.
63 players have faced Isner at least twice in tour-level events. Of those, the most effective has been Lleyton Hewitt, holding Isner’s ace rate under 10% and winning almost half of Isner’s serve points. However, the most recent of those two matches was almost two years ago. Still, it’s not surprising to see a world-class counterpuncher atop this list–Hewitt limits aces and service holds against just about everybody.
We find more of the same near the top of the list, with Juan Ignacio Chela, Gilles Simon, and Nikolay Davydenko all in the top 10, ranked by the rate of return points won. Height might also help in handling the physics-defying bounces of the Isner serve: both Tomas Berdych and Juan Martin Del Potro are among the top 15, though some other tall guys (Kevin Anderson and Ivo Karlovic are shown below) have generally weak return games, so the argument doesn’t seem to apply to them.
The unexpected contrast on this list is to find Nadal several spots below Djokovic, Federer, and Andy Murray. Nadal allows about the same ace rate as Djokovic and Murray, but he doesn’t perform as well on the balls he gets back in play. One popular theory is that because of his height, Isner is able to neutralize some of Rafa’s spin. Regardless of the reason why, it’s even more unexpected to see Rafa so far down the list, since two of the three Nadal-Isner matches have taken place on clay.
Here are some of the raw results for players who have faced Isner two or more times. I’ve shown the 20 opponents who have won the most return points, along with ten other notable players, whose ranks (out of 63) are shown in parenthesis.
Opponent SvPts Matches Ace% SvPtsWon Lleyton Hewitt 124 2 8.9% 53.2% Tomas Berdych 300 3 11.7% 57.7% Thiemo De Bakker* 165 2 9.1% 60.0% Mikhail Youzhny 258 2 16.3% 61.6% Juan Ignacio Chela 269 3 6.7% 62.1% Novak Djokovic 191 2 14.1% 62.3% Andy Murray 224 2 13.8% 62.5% Roger Federer 243 3 11.5% 63.0% Gilles Simon 244 2 15.2% 63.9% Nikolay Davydenko 248 3 18.5% 64.1% David Ferrer 326 4 14.7% 64.4% Viktor Troicki 234 3 9.0% 64.5% Juan Martin Del Potro 201 3 16.4% 64.7% Robin Haase 233 2 15.0% 64.8% Rafael Nadal 336 3 13.7% 64.9% Richard Gasquet 221 2 19.0% 65.2% Marat Safin 115 2 13.9% 65.2% Mardy Fish 424 4 13.4% 65.6% David Nalbandian 259 2 19.7% 65.6% Feliciano Lopez 207 2 19.3% 66.2% (22) Jurgen Melzer 177 2 16.4% 66.7% (25) Fernando Gonzalez 185 2 16.8% 68.6% (27) Gael Monfils 651 6 15.4% 69.1% (29) Andy Roddick 466 5 20.0% 69.5% (32) Jo Wilfried Tsonga 227 2 13.2% 70.5% (40) Kevin Anderson 443 6 16.9% 71.6% (41) Ivo Karlovic 289 3 15.9% 71.6% (46) Lukasz Kubot 167 2 21.0% 73.1% (57) Alex Bogomolov Jr 221 3 23.1% 77.4% (63) Andrey Golubev 127 2 9.4% 84.3%
(De Bakker gets an asterisk because one of his two matches immediately followed Isner-Mahut, and John was playing injured.)
An interesting avenue for further research is whether return quality against Isner differs much from return quality against players in general. Sure, Isner wins more points on serve and hits more aces, but looking at the list above, it doesn’t seem to differ much from a ranking of the game’s best returners. For all of his uniqueness, he’s simply one very big server in a game full of big servers. As he goes deeper in more tournaments, perhaps we’ll gain a better grasp of what players need to do to stop him.
Wow, great numbers! Hope John can keep improving and winning matches.
Last week I attended Isner’s 3 matches with Simon, Joker and Fed, and noticed the affect of his gearing up the mph on his serve to 130+ at the end of sets. None of these 3 opponents had much difficulty returning his serve when the mph was in the 120’s, and Joker and Simon made it look effortless. Fed had some trouble, but some of it may have been due to the strong winds and some due to his playing return games strategically, only expending effort before the end of the set if he happened to win one of the first two points on return (this seems a general strategy for Fed now that he is holding serve such a ridiculous percentage of the time – 92% so far this year, 2nd only to Raonic’s 94%, and better than Isner’s 89%). Most of the breaks of Isner’s serve happened early in sets, and if he broke back then I recall he generally held on afterwards.
So glad you did this, Jeff. I’ve been writing about Isner now whenever possible since the marathon (about which I wrote a marathon blog article in 2010), and will be doing more this month and next month (with the Davis Cup tie v France).
Rick
That’s interesting about the serve speeds — I’ll have to see if that was the case at the slams, where I do have serve speed data for Isner’s matches. I’d imagine not many people can do much with 130+ mph serves!
Yeah, like it or not, Isner is no longer just a sideshow. Karlovic snuck into the top 20 for a while, but Isner in the top 10 is a whole different story.
I like these numbers. and hope he could do better than andy~ improve fast and win a grand slam