Last night, Novak Djokovic cemented his status as the US Open favorite, all without doing a thing.
The 32-man draw has 19 seeds left, but only two others remain in Novak’s quarter, and those two–Tommy Haas and Mikhail Youzhny–play each other in the 3rd round. Djokovic will face the shocking Joao Sousa in his third-rounder, followed by the winner of Tim Smyczek–Marcel Granollers in the fourth.
Novak’s quarterfinal threat was supposed to be Juan Martin del Potro, and that’s where the Serbian has really gained. Lleyton Hewitt upset Delpo in a slipshod five-setter last night, making Djokovic’s most likely QF opponent Tommy Haas. While Haas has a recent win against the world #1, you have to figure he remains the preferred opponent.
These shifts in the draw mean that my forecast now gives Djokovic almost exactly double the chances of winning of his nearest competitor, Rafael Nadal. Nadal, of course, has a much trickier path to the semifinals, likely having to go through both John Isner and Roger Federer. Andy Murray has a more fortunate draw than that, but he’ll probably need to beat Tomas Berdych to earn a matchup with Djokovic.
—
Djokovic didn’t look dominant in his second-round win, but it was Murray who lost a set yesterday, to journeyman Argentine Leonardo Mayer, a 26-year-old who has yet to crack the top 50. The defending champion recovered just fine, but is second-round weakness a sign of bad things to come?
The short answer is no. Since 1991, seven US Open champions have been pushed to four or five sets in their second round match en route to the title, though none have suffered that fate since 2004, when eventual champ Federer dropped a set to Marcos Baghdatis. Another three titlists lost at least one set in the first round.
However, few of those early-round challengers have been as anonymous as Mayer. Besides Baghdatis, the most recent second-round threats have been Ivan Ljubicic and James Blake. The last time an Open champion dropped a second-round set to such an anonymous figure was in 2000, when Marat Safin needed five sets to get past Gianluca Pozzi.
Also worth noting is that in Murray’s trio of notable victories–last year’s Olympics and US Open, plus this year’s Wimbledon–he has never dropped a set so early. In fact, in London this summer, he won his first four matches in straights before battling through a five-setter against Fernando Verdasco.
Whatever else you might say about Verdasco, he’s a much more dangerous opponent than Leonardo Mayer.
—
American grinder Tim Smyczek scored the biggest win of his career yesterday with a five-set victory over Alex Bogomolov. Smyczek has taken advantage of an easy draw (Bogie defeated Benoit Paire in the first round) to reach his first Grand Slam round of 32 in his fifth main draw appearance.
He has a rare opportunity to go even further, facing 43rd-ranked Marcel Granollers, also the beneficiary of a friendly draw thanks to Fabio Fognini‘s first-round loss. Granollers has played 18 slams on hard and grass courts, never reaching the round of 16.
It’s a strange world when Smyczek is one of only three Americans–along with John Isner and Jack Sock–still alive. Stranger still is the very real possibility that Tim will be the only man standing two days from now. Sock faces Janko Tipsarevic, a winnable match but not one he’ll be favored in. Isner is ranked higher than his next opponent, Philipp Kohlschreiber, but the German eliminated him in last year’s Open.
Smyczek, on the other hand, has nothing to lose. Well, except for his pride, when he reaches the fourth round and suffers a triple-bagel at the hands of Novak Djokovic.
—
If you’re already worrying about not having enough matches to watch during week two, look no further than Colette Lewis’s thorough US Open Juniors preview, which lays out the contenders in both the boys’ and girls’ draw.
I know it’s old news, but this analysis of Djokovic’s improved odds reminds me of why a probability tree (at least at times) is so much more useful than mere anecdotal thinking.
i.e. pundits & fans alike, me included, are all thinking & saying “Rafa is hot hot hot and therefore the favorite, while Djokovic is stale and therefore a dog.” We nod & heads and acknowledge that draws can be tricky or tough or easy, yet still in our mind’s eye we see that antimated GIF of Nadal looking invincibly god-like as he cracks a blistering forehand past a low-ranked opponent. The human mind does not seem to be wired for calculating probabilities as such.
Yeah, exactly. My main complaint is how everyone simply pencils the top four into the semifinals, as if there is a 99.5% chance they make it. True for Djokovic right now, but rarely true in general.